<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~files/feed-premium.xsl"?>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:feedpress="https://feed.press/xmlns" xmlns:podcast="https://podcastindex.org/namespace/1.0" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <feedpress:locale>en</feedpress:locale>
    <atom:link rel="self" href="https://feeds.dzone.com/monitoring-and-observability"/>
    <atom:link rel="hub" href="https://feedpress.superfeedr.com/"/>
    <title>DZone Monitoring and Observability Zone</title>
    <link>https://dzone.com/monitoring-and-observability</link>
    <description>Recent posts in Monitoring and Observability on DZone.com</description>
    <item>
      <title>AWS Managed Database Observability: Monitoring DynamoDB, ElastiCache, and Redshift Beyond CloudWatch</title>
      <link>https://feeds.dzone.com/link/23570/17346351/aws-database-observability</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p data-line-end="3" data-line-start="2">A DynamoDB throttle alarm fires at 2 am. You confirm the spike in CloudWatch, then check ElastiCache in a second dashboard, then Redshift in a third. Cache hit rate dropped, which hammered DynamoDB, which stalled the zero-ETL export. Three services, three dashboards, one cascade you can only trace by hand.</p>
<p data-line-end="5" data-line-start="4">This guide maps the specific metrics, alarm thresholds, and configuration steps for each service, and then addresses the observability delta that CloudWatch leaves unresolved: cross-service correlation, root-cause traceability, and the capacity-planning intelligence that prevents cascades in the first place.</p><img src="https://feeds.dzone.com/link/23570/17346351.gif" height="1" width="1"/>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2026 13:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dzone.com/articles/3653855</guid>
      <media:thumbnail url="https://dz2cdn1.dzone.com/thumbnail?fid=19030396&amp;w=600"/>
      <dc:creator>Damaso Sanoja</dc:creator>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Architecting Petabyte-Scale Hyperspectral Pipelines on AWS</title>
      <link>https://feeds.dzone.com/link/23570/17345912/petabyte-hyperspectral-pipelines-aws</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<h2 dir="ltr">The Data Challenge</h2>
<p dir="ltr">Every industry has its version of the same data engineering problem: massive, complex payloads generated at the edge — far from the cloud, often on unreliable networks — that need to become queryable, structured datasets as fast as possible. In genomics, it is multi-gigabyte sequencing files produced by instruments in labs.&nbsp;</p>
<p dir="ltr">In <a href="https://dzone.com/articles/middleware-in-autonomous-vehicles">autonomous vehicles,</a> it is LiDAR and camera telemetry streaming off test fleets. The underlying architectural challenge is the same in every case: ingest heavy data at burst scale, store it cost-effectively for years, and transform it into something an analyst or ML model can actually use without touching the raw files.</p><img src="https://feeds.dzone.com/link/23570/17345912.gif" height="1" width="1"/>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2026 19:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dzone.com/articles/3650191</guid>
      <media:thumbnail url="https://dz2cdn1.dzone.com/thumbnail?fid=18993073&amp;w=600"/>
      <dc:creator>Anil Bodepudi</dc:creator>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why SAP S/4HANA Landscape Design Impacts Cloud TCO More Than Compute Costs</title>
      <link>https://feeds.dzone.com/link/23570/17344939/why-sap-s4hana-landscape-design-impacts-cloud-tco</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<h2 data-end="1131" data-start="1093">Introduction: Beyond Compute Prices</h2>
<p data-end="2040" data-start="1133">When <a href="https://dzone.com/articles/zero-downtime-option-zdo-when-to-use-and-when-to-avoid">migrating or running SAP S/4HANA</a> on AWS, many organizations fixate on EC2 instance prices and assume that choosing the cheapest instance types will yield the biggest savings. In reality, cloud TCO is heavily impacted by landscape design choices, how many environments you run, how they’re sized, how data is managed and what auxiliary services you use. Cutting cloud costs isn’t just about shrinking VM sizes it’s about architecting an efficient <a href="https://dzone.com/articles/aws-overlay-ip-in-sap-landscapes">SAP landscape</a>. As one SAP FinOps guide notes, focusing only on instance sizing addresses symptoms, not causes. True cost optimization asks Is the SAP landscape design efficient? Are you running unnecessary SAP instances, and can workloads consolidate onto fewer systems?. In other words, a thoughtful landscape architecture often yields larger savings than a simple per-server cost reduction.</p>
<h2 data-end="2090" data-start="2042">Understanding an SAP S/4HANA Landscape on AWS</h2>
<p data-end="3276" data-start="2092">A typical S/4HANA landscape consists of multiple tiers and environments. You might have separate DEV, QA, Staging and Production systems each a full SAP stack with its own HANA database and application servers. On AWS, that could translate to dozens of EC2 instances, along with associated storage and network infrastructure. Each additional environment or system copy multiplies costs for compute, Amazon EBS storage, Amazon EFS shared file systems, backup retention, and so on. Landscape design decisions such as how many parallel systems to run or whether every environment needs high availability can quickly outweigh the cost of an individual EC2 instance.</p><img src="https://feeds.dzone.com/link/23570/17344939.gif" height="1" width="1"/>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2026 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dzone.com/articles/3639209</guid>
      <media:thumbnail url="https://dz2cdn1.dzone.com/thumbnail?fid=18991584&amp;w=600"/>
      <dc:creator>Deepika Paturu</dc:creator>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Manual Investigation: The Hidden Bottleneck in Incident Response</title>
      <link>https://feeds.dzone.com/link/23570/17343592/bottleneck-incident-response</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p dir="ltr">Every engineering team I talk to has the same problem. When a P1 fires, coding stops. An engineer gets pulled in, spends 30 to 60 minutes hunting through logs, tracing requests across three or four systems, and cross-referencing deployment history before they can even form a hypothesis about what broke. By the time they have a diagnosis, they've already burned the better part of their morning.</p>
<p dir="ltr">We've normalized this. It's just become part of the job. But the math is brutal: A team handling 50 incidents per month at 4 to 8 hours of resolve time each is looking at 200 to 400 engineering hours lost. That's a full month of a senior engineer's capacity dedicated entirely to looking backward.</p><img src="https://feeds.dzone.com/link/23570/17343592.gif" height="1" width="1"/>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 15:00:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dzone.com/articles/3650022</guid>
      <media:thumbnail url="https://dz2cdn1.dzone.com/thumbnail?fid=18978667&amp;w=600"/>
      <dc:creator>Brian Kaufman</dc:creator>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>We Went Multi-Cloud and Almost Drowned: Lessons From Running Across AWS, GCP, and Azure</title>
      <link>https://feeds.dzone.com/link/23570/17343465/multi-cloud-lessons-aws-gcp-azure</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>It started, as most bad architectural decisions do, with a PowerPoint slide from a VP who had just returned from a conference. “We need to avoid vendor lock-in,” he declared, and suddenly our platform engineer team had a mandate to distribute workloads across three public clouds. Eighteen months later, we had something that technically ran on three major public clouds (AWS, GCP, and Azure). We also had a Terraform code that made people cry and an on-call rotation nobody wanted.</p>
<p>This is what I learned about multi-cloud strategy, not the vendor pitch but the messy reality of keeping production alive across multi-cloud boundaries.</p><img src="https://feeds.dzone.com/link/23570/17343465.gif" height="1" width="1"/>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 13:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dzone.com/articles/3646955</guid>
      <media:thumbnail url="https://dz2cdn1.dzone.com/thumbnail?fid=18984937&amp;w=600"/>
      <dc:creator>Pruthvi Raj Seknametla</dc:creator>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Observability in Spring Boot 4</title>
      <link>https://feeds.dzone.com/link/23570/17342050/observability-in-spring-boot-4</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In microservices, you’ve likely broken a cold sweat more than once when a request suddenly 'vanishes' the moment it hits a Database or a Message Broker. It is a true operational nightmare. However, with the release of <b data-index-in-node="232" data-path-to-node="1">Spring Boot 4</b> in early 2026, building a comprehensive Observability system has become easier than ever, thanks to the 'all-in' support from <a href="https://dzone.com/articles/opentelemetry-tracing-on-spring-boot-java-agent-vs-micrometer-testing">micrometer tracing</a>.</p>
<h2 data-path-to-node="1">The Problem: "Anonymous" Queries</h2>
<p data-path-to-node="2">When your database starts lagging (slow queries), you check the <code data-index-in-node="64" data-path-to-node="2">processlist</code> in <a href="https://dzone.com/refcardz/essential-mysql">MySQL</a> only to find a vague line:</p><img src="https://feeds.dzone.com/link/23570/17342050.gif" height="1" width="1"/>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 17:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dzone.com/articles/3637143</guid>
      <media:thumbnail url="https://dz2cdn1.dzone.com/thumbnail?fid=18984683&amp;w=600"/>
      <dc:creator>ha dinh thai</dc:creator>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Agent Protocol Stack: MCP vs. A2A vs. AG-UI</title>
      <link>https://feeds.dzone.com/link/23570/17342012/mcp-vs-a2a-vs-agui</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>If you're building AI agents in 2026, you've probably bumped into at least one of these acronyms: <strong>MCP</strong>, <strong>A2A</strong>, <strong>AG-UI</strong>. Maybe all three. And if you're anything like me, your first reaction was: <em>"Are these competing standards? Do I need all of them? Which one do I actually use?"</em></p>
<p>Here's the short answer: They're not competing — they're complementary. Each one solves a different problem at a different layer of the agent architecture. Think of them like TCP, HTTP, and HTML — different protocols at different layers that work together to make the web function.</p><img src="https://feeds.dzone.com/link/23570/17342012.gif" height="1" width="1"/>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dzone.com/articles/3651194</guid>
      <media:thumbnail url="https://dz2cdn1.dzone.com/thumbnail?fid=18984666&amp;w=600"/>
      <dc:creator>Jubin Abhishek Soni</dc:creator>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>AWS Kiro: The Agentic IDE That Makes Specs the Unit of Work</title>
      <link>https://feeds.dzone.com/link/23570/17339915/kiro-feature-to-requirements-design-tasks</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The agentic IDE space has gotten crowded fast. Cursor, Claude Code, Copilot, Windsurf — they all share the same core model: you type a prompt, the AI writes some code, you iterate. It works well for prototyping. It breaks down when you're building production systems on a large codebase with a team of more than one.</p>
<p>AWS Kiro takes a different bet. Instead of chat-first, it's <strong>spec-first</strong>. The unit of work isn't a prompt — it's a structured specification that the agent uses to plan, implement, verify, and document your feature end to end. That's a meaningful philosophical difference, and in practice it changes what the tool is useful for.</p><img src="https://feeds.dzone.com/link/23570/17339915.gif" height="1" width="1"/>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 14:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dzone.com/articles/3655491</guid>
      <media:thumbnail url="https://dz2cdn1.dzone.com/thumbnail?fid=19017064&amp;w=600"/>
      <dc:creator>Jubin Abhishek Soni</dc:creator>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Cost of Knowing: When Observability Becomes the Outage</title>
      <link>https://feeds.dzone.com/link/23570/17339867/when-observability-becomes-the-outage</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">There's a particular kind of smugness that infects teams with mature <a href="https://dzone.com/articles/building-a-resilient-observability-stack">observability stacks</a>. Dashboards everywhere. Latency percentiles, error budgets, trace waterfalls with microsecond resolution — the whole cathedral. And then the AWS bill arrives and someone in finance flags a line item that's larger than the EC2 spend, and suddenly the cathedral looks less like engineering excellence and more like a money furnace nobody was watching.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">This is not a hypothetical.</p><img src="https://feeds.dzone.com/link/23570/17339867.gif" height="1" width="1"/>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 13:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dzone.com/articles/3645756</guid>
      <media:thumbnail url="https://dz2cdn1.dzone.com/thumbnail?fid=18980742&amp;w=600"/>
      <dc:creator>David Iyanu Jonathan</dc:creator>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Monitoring Spring Boot Applications with Prometheus and Grafana</title>
      <link>https://feeds.dzone.com/link/23570/17338655/monitoring-spring-boot-applications-with-prometheus</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<h2><strong>Monitoring Spring Boot Applications with Prometheus and Grafana</strong></h2>
<p data-end="509" data-start="216">Spring Boot’s Actuator and Micrometer provide rich metrics that can be scraped by <a href="https://dzone.com/articles/getting-started-with-prometheus-workshop-introduct">Prometheus</a> and visualized in <a href="https://dzone.com/articles/introduction-to-grafana-prometheus-and-zabbix">Grafana</a>. This guide covers configuring a Spring Boot application to expose Prometheus-formatted metrics, writing custom metrics, and setting up Prometheus and Grafana for monitoring.</p>
<p data-end="910" data-start="511">We cover installing Prometheus, writing a configuration to scrape your application, importing Grafana dashboards, and crafting PromQL queries and alerting rules. We also discuss Prometheus best practices, including metric naming conventions, label cardinality, and retention settings. Security considerations, troubleshooting tips, and the performance impact of metrics collection are also included.</p><img src="https://feeds.dzone.com/link/23570/17338655.gif" height="1" width="1"/>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2026 18:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dzone.com/articles/3639645</guid>
      <media:thumbnail url="https://dz2cdn1.dzone.com/thumbnail?fid=18978574&amp;w=600"/>
      <dc:creator>Ramya vani Rayala</dc:creator>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Serverless Illusion: When “Pay for What You Use” Becomes Expensive</title>
      <link>https://feeds.dzone.com/link/23570/17338580/serverless-illusion-when-you-pay-what-you-use</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">The pitch is seductive in its simplicity. You write a function. You deploy it. You pay only for the milliseconds it runs. No servers idling through the night, no reserved capacity gathering dust, no 3 a.m. pager alerts because a VM decided to kernel panic during a deployment window. The cloud provider handles the undifferentiated heavy lifting — their phrase, not mine — and you, liberated from operational tedium, focus on building the thing that actually matters.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">I believed this. Genuinely. For a long time.</p><img src="https://feeds.dzone.com/link/23570/17338580.gif" height="1" width="1"/>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2026 17:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dzone.com/articles/3645755</guid>
      <media:thumbnail url="https://dz2cdn1.dzone.com/thumbnail?fid=18978550&amp;w=600"/>
      <dc:creator>David Iyanu Jonathan</dc:creator>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Death of "Text-Only" ChatOps: Why Google's A2UI Matters for DevOps and SRE</title>
      <link>https://feeds.dzone.com/link/23570/17336854/death-of-text-only-chatops-why-googles-a2ui</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<div data-orientation="horizontal" data-state="active" tabindex="0">
 <div data-orientation="horizontal" dir="ltr">
  <div data-orientation="horizontal" data-state="active" tabindex="0">
   <div dir="auto">
    <p>The recent release of <strong>A2UI (Agent-to-User Interface)</strong> by Google introduces a standardized, open-source protocol for how <a href="https://dzone.com/articles/engineering-ai-agent-skill-enterprise-ui-generation">AI agents render user interfaces</a>. For MLOps, DevOps, and SRE teams, this moves beyond the brittle "text-only" paradigm of traditional ChatOps into a new era of <strong>Agentic Interfaces</strong>.</p>
    <p>The following DZone-style article explores how A2UI works and why it is a critical tool for operational workflows.</p><img src="https://feeds.dzone.com/link/23570/17336854.gif" height="1" width="1"/>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dzone.com/articles/3619090</guid>
      <media:thumbnail url="https://dz2cdn1.dzone.com/thumbnail?fid=18886365&amp;w=600"/>
      <dc:creator>Deneesh Narayanasamy</dc:creator>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Designing Self-Healing AI Infrastructure: The Role of Autonomous Recovery</title>
      <link>https://feeds.dzone.com/link/23570/17336304/designing-self-healing-ai-infrastructure</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<h2 data-end="1136" data-section-id="1j64ow9" data-start="1089">When Incident Response Becomes the Bottleneck</h2>
<p data-end="1357" data-start="1138"><a href="https://dzone.com/articles/ai-agents-cloud-engineering-autonomous-reliability">Reliability engineering</a> has historically relied on a predictable workflow. A monitoring system detects an anomaly, an alert is triggered, and an engineer investigates logs and metrics before applying a remediation step. This model works reasonably well for traditional applications where failures occur slowly and are relatively easy to diagnose. AI-driven systems behave differently.</p>
<p data-end="1808" data-start="1526">Modern AI platforms are built on layers of interconnected services. A typical architecture may include data ingestion pipelines, feature generation systems, vector databases, inference services, and orchestration frameworks that coordinate agents or downstream automation workflows. Failures rarely occur in isolation. A minor delay in a retrieval service can increase inference latency, which then cascades into application-level instability. In high-throughput systems processing thousands of requests per minute, such instability can propagate across the entire system before engineers have time to investigate the initial alert.</p><img src="https://feeds.dzone.com/link/23570/17336304.gif" height="1" width="1"/>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dzone.com/articles/3639925</guid>
      <media:thumbnail url="https://dz2cdn1.dzone.com/thumbnail?fid=18934310&amp;w=600"/>
      <dc:creator>Sayali Patil</dc:creator>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>End-to-End Event Streaming With Kafka, Spring Boot and AWS SQS/SNS (Production-Ready Code Guide)</title>
      <link>https://feeds.dzone.com/link/23570/17328755/end-to-end-event-streaming-with-kafka-spring-boot</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p data-end="768" data-start="101">Event-driven applications often demand high throughput, reliable delivery and flexible fan out messaging. Each platform in our stack plays a distinct role: <a href="https://dzone.com/articles/kafka-real-time-data-dashboards?fromrel=true">Apache Kafka</a> provides a distributed high volume event log, Amazon SQS offers durable point to point queues and Amazon SNS enables pub/sub broadcasting to multiple subscribers. Using them together yields a robust pipeline teams commonly use Kafka for streaming, SQS for decoupled processing and SNS for multicasting events. This synergy leverages the strengths of each platform to build scalable, loosely coupled systems.</p>
<h2 data-end="1431" data-section-id="18pwj5f" data-start="1407">Architecture Overview</h2>
<p data-end="1529" data-start="1433">The pipeline involves multiple components working together in sequence. Below is the event flow:</p><img src="https://feeds.dzone.com/link/23570/17328755.gif" height="1" width="1"/>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 18:00:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dzone.com/articles/3642551</guid>
      <media:thumbnail url="https://dz2cdn1.dzone.com/thumbnail?fid=18953051&amp;w=600"/>
      <dc:creator>Mallikharjuna Manepalli</dc:creator>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>5 Ways Azure AI Search Enhances Enterprise RAG Architectures</title>
      <link>https://feeds.dzone.com/link/23570/17328638/azure-ai-search-enhances-rag</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The transition from experimental Proof of Concepts (POCs) to production-grade applications is the most significant hurdle for enterprises today. At the heart of this transition lies retrieval-augmented generation (RAG). While the "Generation" part — handled by large language models (LLMs) like GPT-4 — is often the focus, the quality of the "retrieval" determines whether an AI application provides value or hallucinates incorrect information.</p>
<p>Azure AI Search (formerly known as Azure Cognitive Search) has emerged as a powerhouse in this space. By moving beyond simple vector databases and offering a comprehensive information retrieval platform, it addresses the unique challenges of the enterprise: scale, security, and precision. In this article, we will deep-dive into the five key ways Azure AI Search is improving enterprise RAG, backed by technical architecture, code examples, and performance insights.</p><img src="https://feeds.dzone.com/link/23570/17328638.gif" height="1" width="1"/>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 14:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dzone.com/articles/3651500</guid>
      <media:thumbnail url="https://dz2cdn1.dzone.com/thumbnail?fid=19001575&amp;w=600"/>
      <dc:creator>Jubin Abhishek Soni</dc:creator>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What AWS Kiro Matters for Agentic Development</title>
      <link>https://feeds.dzone.com/link/23570/17327939/aws-kiro-matters-agentic-development</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The evolution of artificial intelligence (AI) has transitioned from passive chat interfaces to active, autonomous agents. This shift, known as agentic development, requires a fundamental rethink of cloud infrastructure. In traditional AI workflows, a single request is sent to a large language model (LLM), and a response is received. In agentic workflows, dozens or even hundreds of small, specialized agents must communicate, share state, and access tools in real-time. This creates a massive networking and latency bottleneck that standard REST-based architectures cannot handle.</p>
<p>Enter <strong>AWS Kiro</strong>. AWS Kiro (Kernel-Integrated Runtime Orchestrator) is a specialized, high-performance infrastructure layer designed specifically for the orchestration of multi-agent systems. It moves beyond the limitations of standard container orchestration to provide a low-latency, state-aware environment where agents can thrive. This article provides a deep dive into what AWS Kiro is, how it works, and why it is the missing piece for the next generation of AI development.</p><img src="https://feeds.dzone.com/link/23570/17327939.gif" height="1" width="1"/>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 15:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dzone.com/articles/3651501</guid>
      <media:thumbnail url="https://dz2cdn1.dzone.com/thumbnail?fid=19004164&amp;w=600"/>
      <dc:creator>Jubin Abhishek Soni</dc:creator>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Architecting Autonomous Agents: A Deep Dive into Azure AI Foundry Agent Service</title>
      <link>https://feeds.dzone.com/link/23570/17326378/architecting-autonomous-agents-a-deep-dive-into-az</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The landscape of <a href="https://dzone.com/articles/generative-ai-today-innovation-and-challenges">Generative AI is shifting rapidly</a> from simple chat interfaces to autonomous agents. While large language models (LLMs) provide the reasoning engine, agents provide the hands and feet — the ability to interact with tools, query databases, execute code, and maintain long-term context.</p>
<p>Microsoft’s latest evolution in this space is the <strong>Azure AI Foundry Agent Service</strong>. Built upon the foundations of the OpenAI Assistants API but integrated deeply into the Azure ecosystem, it provides a managed, secure, and scalable environment for deploying sophisticated AI agents. This article provides a comprehensive technical deep dive into its architecture, core components, and implementation strategies.</p><img src="https://feeds.dzone.com/link/23570/17326378.gif" height="1" width="1"/>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 14:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dzone.com/articles/3642533</guid>
      <media:thumbnail url="https://dz2cdn1.dzone.com/thumbnail?fid=18949110&amp;w=600"/>
      <dc:creator>Jubin Abhishek Soni</dc:creator>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>AWS vs GCP Security: Best Practices for Protecting Infrastructure, Data, and Networks</title>
      <link>https://feeds.dzone.com/link/23570/17324848/aws-shared-responsibility-model-security</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p data-selectable-paragraph="">How would you comprehensively analyze and propose solutions for system, network, and infrastructure security issues on GCP and AWS, considering native and third-party cloud security services, focusing on preventing unauthorized access, securing data transmission, and enhancing overall resilience?</p>
<p data-selectable-paragraph="">Analyzing system, network, and infrastructure security problems and offering solutions in cloud service providers such as GCP (Google Cloud Platform) or AWS (Amazon Web Services) requires a comprehensive approach. First of all, all employees need to understand the shared responsibility model.</p><img src="https://feeds.dzone.com/link/23570/17324848.gif" height="1" width="1"/>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 14:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dzone.com/articles/3636442</guid>
      <media:thumbnail url="https://dz2cdn1.dzone.com/thumbnail?fid=18942832&amp;w=600"/>
      <dc:creator>Kadir Arslan</dc:creator>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Observability on the Edge With OTel and FluentBit</title>
      <link>https://feeds.dzone.com/link/23570/17324260/observability-otel-fluentbit</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>When we design observability pipelines for modern cloud environments, we implicitly rely on a set of luxurious guarantees: limitless bandwidth, highly available networks, practically infinite storage, and abundant computing power. But when you move these workloads to the edge, think of a maritime vessel navigating the mid-Atlantic or a remote wind turbine, those guarantees vanish. <span data-start-index="495">Edge environments are constrained by intermittent connectivity, severe limits on CPU and RAM, and a lack of persistent storage guarantees. You simply cannot run a full, traditional observability stack locally, nor can you stream everything to the cloud without exhausting limited satellite bandwidth.</span></p>
<p>The engineering challenge becomes clear: how do we build a pipeline that reliably captures traces, metrics, and logs, survives unpredictable network outages, and perfectly correlates signals without saturating edge constraints? A highly compelling, production-realistic solution to this problem was showcased for KubeCon EU 2026, demonstrating a fully correlated observability pipeline built for constrained edge environments using <a href="https://dzone.com/articles/opentelemetry-ending-era-of-fragmented-visibility">OpenTelemetry</a> and Fluent Bit. You can explore the complete implementation in the <a href="https://github.com/graz-dev/observability-on-edge" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"><span data-start-index="1178">graz-dev/observability-on-edge</span></a><span data-start-index="1178">&nbsp;repository.</span></p><img src="https://feeds.dzone.com/link/23570/17324260.gif" height="1" width="1"/>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 15:30:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dzone.com/articles/3652435</guid>
      <media:thumbnail url="https://dz2cdn1.dzone.com/thumbnail?fid=18996124&amp;w=600"/>
      <dc:creator>Graziano Casto</dc:creator>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Pod Prometheus Never Saw: Kubernetes' Sampling Blind Spot</title>
      <link>https://feeds.dzone.com/link/23570/17324173/k8s-sampling-blind-spot</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<h2>The Fix That Doesn't Fix It</h2>
<p>Reducing your Prometheus scrape interval from 15 seconds to 5 seconds does not fix the sampling blind spot. It moves it. Any pod whose entire lifetime falls within one 5-second scrape gap is still structurally invisible — not because of misconfiguration, not because of missing rules, but because poll-based collection has an irreducible sampling gap that no interval setting eliminates.</p>
<p>This article explains exactly why that is, what it costs in production, and what actually fixes it.</p><img src="https://feeds.dzone.com/link/23570/17324173.gif" height="1" width="1"/>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 13:30:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dzone.com/articles/3650510</guid>
      <media:thumbnail url="https://dz2cdn1.dzone.com/thumbnail?fid=18999550&amp;w=600"/>
      <dc:creator>Shamsher Khan</dc:creator>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
